Share this
How do you pick the best IT services company for your specific delivery needs?
by Ray Cooke on 19 May 2016
When you need the help of an IT services company you no doubt will want a company that is going to help you deliver the result your organisation needs. Finding and picking the right IT company for your circumstances is not always straight forward, so in this Blab we covered the question "How do you pick the best IT services company for your specific delivery needs?"
You may also be interested in our previous Blab question relating to this topic What should you expect from your IT service provider?
Blab presenters
Our presenters during the Blab presentation are:
- Top Left-hand side: Ray Cooke, Lean and Agile business transformation coach, Equinox IT Wellington office
- Top Right-hand side: Carl Weller, Senior Consultant, Equinox IT Wellington office
- Bottom Left-hand side: Paul Ramsay, Principal Consultant, Equinox IT Wellington office.
Transcript of conversation
Ray: "How do you pick the best IT services company for your delivery needs?" As you've already alluded to, Paul, there are obviously different constraints and different types of organisations. So within government, there's kind of the RFP process, there are panels, the all-of-government options. I guess how do we pick from within that? And also as a private organisation, how can we go about finding a good organisation to work with to help on that delivery basis? Just on that note, Paul has written a blog post on this very topic previously, which I'm going to stick in the Twitter feed now for people to look up. So not that we're looking for you, Paul, at all to leave a comment on this one.
Paul: Yeah, if you're looking at a company other than Equinox IT, then you go back to some of those initial points. First of all, do they have the necessary skills to actually undertake the work? What evidence can you see of that, both in terms of the resources that they have available and the references that they have as well. So a good company who has the right people will also have the right references and will be able to point you to case studies and to other clients who have undertaken similar work.
Is it a good company to engage with? Does their engagement model fit what we talked about before where they're looking for a partnership sort of arrangement where they want to understand what your needs and issues are before they get into the all-too-easy task in some cases of thinking you've got the answer to the problem? So how do they engage, how do they work with you, are they people of their word and integrity in terms of the way in which they operate, and do they look for that mutual win-win in terms of any particular opportunity; that they deliver a good result for you, and in doing so, they have a successfully referenceable client as well.
Ray: That works fairly well if you've already got someone you've worked with before and they can recommend for you. I guess there are going to be plenty of people who are in a scenario where actually they've not engaged an IT delivery function before, they don't know how to get a piece of software made. Where on earth does somebody start? Is Google your friend or is it kind of...I imagine that's quite a thorny problem for some people.
Paul: Yeah, I think that's a good question in the sense that I think the reality is that a lot of services now, IT services, are quite often self-selected where the customer has exactly done what you've said, Ray, which is they've gone out there, they've looked on Google, they've gone to your website, they've had a look on the website, they've looked at the list of services or the case studies, they like the cut of Carl's chin, and say, "Yeah, that's the organisation that we want to go with."
I think the same is true for us as consumers as well. Nowadays I think people are much more savvy in the way that they procure. They go out there, they shop around, they compare prices, they look for good, trustworthy organisations that they can deal with, and they look to have a good working relationship as well, because I think that's really important. You might think you win at the front end, but you lose at the back end in terms of maintenance and operations, for example. So it is really important, one of the important considerations is to have that whole-of-life view as well.
Ray: Yeah. We'll get on to the contracts in a minute, but obviously how you then engage those organisations and the kind of organisations that will work with you in a mutually beneficial way as opposed to contracts with specific deliverables and doesn't necessarily then...as the person procuring services you have to worry about making sure you've got absolutely everything nailed from a requirements standpoint in terms of that total cost of ownership and that end-of-life view, because your vendor, your provider, won't necessarily be driven to think of that wider picture that actually you care about long term.
Paul: And I think that's certainly an area where Carl's had, I think, some good observations around slightly different approaches to engagement, and that might be a good one for you to talk a little bit about, Carl.
Carl: Yeah. I did find myself thinking, we talk about partnership and trust, but trust is earned and partnerships grow. I personally would be quite suspicious of someone who came up to me and said, "Let's be partners. Let's go forth and do great things under a very trustful relationship." I'd really want to give them opportunities to actually earn that trust and show me that they can meet commitments that they make, and if that's chunking up your projects smaller or perhaps something as small as just asking them for a bit of advice that you may not be charged for, it's just about growing that relationship over time, not thinking you're going to find the perfect provider straight away.
Ray: Yeah, don't go straight for the $100 million RFP.
Carl: Yeah.
Paul: And I think that's a really good observation that Carl makes. These things need to be demonstrated. So it's giving appropriate opportunities for those values and behaviours to be demonstrated in the relationship that you look to build. And I guess that's the other important thing. Those relationships are built over time, but they can be lost in a moment. So there's always a continual focus on the relationship that you have and the delivery of value and of service to the customer.
Ray: Yeah. So actually because a lot of this is about the next question anyway that we've been putting off, we're going to plop that straight in there now.
Share this
- Agile Development (153)
- Software Development (126)
- Agile (76)
- Scrum (66)
- Application Lifecycle Management (50)
- Capability Development (47)
- Business Analysis (46)
- DevOps (43)
- IT Professional (42)
- Equinox IT News (41)
- Agile Transformation (38)
- IT Consulting (38)
- Knowledge Sharing (36)
- Lean Software Development (35)
- Requirements (35)
- Strategic Planning (35)
- Solution Architecture (34)
- Digital Disruption (32)
- IT Project (31)
- International Leaders (31)
- Digital Transformation (26)
- Project Management (26)
- Cloud (25)
- Azure DevOps (23)
- Coaching (23)
- IT Governance (23)
- System Performance (23)
- Change Management (20)
- Innovation (20)
- MIT Sloan CISR (15)
- Client Briefing Events (13)
- Architecture (12)
- Working from Home (12)
- IT Services (10)
- Data Visualisation (9)
- Kanban (9)
- People (9)
- Business Architecture (8)
- Communities of Practice (8)
- Continuous Integration (7)
- Business Case (4)
- Enterprise Analysis (4)
- Angular UIs (3)
- Business Rules (3)
- GitHub (3)
- Java Development (3)
- Lean Startup (3)
- Satir Change Model (3)
- API (2)
- Automation (2)
- Scaling (2)
- Security (2)
- Toggles (2)
- .Net Core (1)
- AI (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Testing (1)
- ✨ (1)
- August 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (3)
- January 2024 (1)
- September 2023 (2)
- July 2023 (3)
- August 2022 (4)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (1)
- May 2021 (1)
- March 2021 (1)
- February 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (2)
- September 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (1)
- June 2020 (3)
- May 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (8)
- February 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (2)
- February 2019 (1)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (3)
- October 2018 (3)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (4)
- July 2018 (5)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (5)
- March 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (2)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (5)
- August 2017 (3)
- July 2017 (3)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (1)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (6)
- September 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (3)
- June 2016 (4)
- May 2016 (7)
- April 2016 (13)
- March 2016 (8)
- February 2016 (8)
- January 2016 (7)
- December 2015 (9)
- November 2015 (12)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (3)
- July 2015 (8)
- June 2015 (7)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (2)
- May 2014 (9)
- April 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (1)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (3)
- September 2013 (2)
- August 2013 (6)
- July 2013 (2)
- June 2013 (1)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (2)
- December 2012 (1)
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (2)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (3)
- July 2012 (3)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (2)
- October 2011 (2)
- September 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (4)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (3)
- October 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (1)
- October 2008 (1)