Cost modelling helps government agency make better solution decisions
A government agency undertaking a major re-platforming of its core business system needed a complete understanding of the procurement, licensing and operating costs of the new platform including how different component and deployment architecture decisions impact these costs over a ten-year period.
This government agency has a large complex core system with several hundred front-line employees accessing it across the country. This core business system must be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
The government agency’s existing core business system is built on 1990s infrastructure using proprietary software and technology, making it difficult and costly to support and innovate.
To provide a modern platform for ongoing support, maintenance and upgrade of the application they are now moving to a containerised cloud solution which provides them with an open platform and greatly increases their future technical options and ability to innovate.
The agency needed a sophisticated cost model to understand how different component and deployment architecture combinations impacted their total cost of ownership to host, upgrade, and maintain the solution over the next ten years.
Working closely with the project managers, architects, steering committee, vendors, and the client finance team, our Principal Consultant developed architectural models for the solution options and identified the key decisions that would drive procurement and operational costs.
Component dependencies were also analysed to ensure the sequencing of the solution build and timing of component procurement occurred in a logical and cost-effective sequence and aligned with budget timeframes.
The cost model was updated and refined continuously as new information became available following the analysis and testing of components. Sparx EA was used to build a visual representation of the core system options to inform the cost modelling and to allow for ongoing refinements.
With a robust understanding of the costs associated with different solution options and the key architectural decisions that drove those costs, the government agency can make proactive decisions about what components to use, when to procure them, and who to procure them from.
This information allows for ‘fewer surprises’ and results in significant cost savings, reduced time investment, and reduced risk during the build and development phases.
An architecture consultant from Equinox IT worked with the government agency to ensure a complete understanding of the architectural options and the cost implications of each option through architecture modelling and a sophisticated costing model.