Share this
Working on multiple agile development projects and swarming tasks
by Ben Hughes on 19 December 2014
During our webinar last week Learning the hard parts of agile software development, we were asked a number of questions. Two of these are included below with responses:
How do we engage team members to swarm tasks on agile development projects?
This can be tricky when people have a particular specialty and identify themselves in that role, and they are required to swarm on another activity which is outside of their core function. Take a developer for example, who may be required to test if a testing activity requires swarming.
What we find is that often project teams have some members who are interested in many aspects of the software development and are naturally inclined to swarm tasks outside of their specialty. These people make great exemplars of the benefits of cross-functional teams and this can be highlighted to the wider team. During stand-up meetings, or walking the Kanban board, the benefits of swarming and the contribution of people who do it well, can be demonstrated and the results speak for themselves when blocks that have been inhibiting the flow of work are cleared via a swarming approach.
It is a sensitive topic to work through, and you shouldn’t force it, but more show the benefit of swarming for the process that you are following and the project as a whole.
Can people effectively work on multiple agile development projects concurrently?
Scrum projects have a ScrumMaster, who may be a floating resource across multiple projects. But following Scrum the development team (core developers, testers etc) generally are expected to stay on one project. If you have all members of the team spread across multiple projects then this can be challenging.
One problem is the task switching costs of people moving from one project to another. This creates significant churn and waste which adds up across the project team as a whole and becomes a big overhead.
Another problem, again using the example of Scrum, is looking ahead and planning the work that will be delivered in a sprint and being able to commit to that when resourcing is variable. If the whole team is working on multiple projects with variable allocations and unknown availability, then realistic sprint planning cannot happen. This makes running agile projects well very tricky.
While it may be attractive to spread resources, we believe that it is not that compatible with lean and agile approaches, and raises warning signs relating to the potential for waste and increased costs.
Share this
- Agile Development (89)
- Software Development (68)
- Scrum (41)
- Agile (32)
- Business Analysis (28)
- Application Lifecycle Management (27)
- Capability Development (23)
- Requirements (21)
- Lean Software Development (20)
- Solution Architecture (19)
- DevOps (17)
- Digital Disruption (17)
- Project Management (17)
- Coaching (16)
- IT Professional (15)
- IT Project (15)
- Knowledge Sharing (13)
- Equinox IT News (12)
- Agile Transformation (11)
- IT Consulting (11)
- Digital Transformation (10)
- Strategic Planning (10)
- IT Governance (9)
- International Leaders (9)
- People (9)
- Change Management (8)
- Cloud (8)
- MIT Sloan CISR (7)
- Working from Home (6)
- Azure DevOps (5)
- Innovation (5)
- Kanban (5)
- Business Architecture (4)
- Continuous Integration (4)
- Enterprise Analysis (4)
- Client Briefing Events (3)
- GitHub (3)
- IT Services (3)
- AI (2)
- Business Rules (2)
- Communities of Practice (2)
- Data Visualisation (2)
- Java Development (2)
- Lean Startup (2)
- Scaling (2)
- Security (2)
- System Performance (2)
- ✨ (2)
- Automation (1)
- FinOps (1)
- Microsoft Azure (1)
- Satir Change Model (1)
- Testing (1)
- March 2025 (1)
- December 2024 (1)
- August 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (3)
- January 2024 (1)
- September 2023 (2)
- July 2023 (3)
- August 2022 (4)
- July 2021 (1)
- March 2021 (1)
- February 2021 (1)
- November 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (1)
- June 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (3)
- March 2020 (3)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (2)
- December 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (1)
- July 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (1)
- September 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (1)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (4)
- July 2016 (3)
- June 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (5)
- March 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (3)
- December 2015 (5)
- November 2015 (11)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (2)
- July 2015 (7)
- June 2015 (7)
- April 2015 (1)
- March 2015 (2)
- February 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (3)
- September 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (2)
- May 2014 (8)
- April 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (2)
- November 2013 (1)
- October 2013 (2)
- September 2013 (2)
- August 2013 (2)
- May 2013 (1)
- April 2013 (3)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (1)
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (2)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- November 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (4)
- April 2011 (2)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
- October 2008 (1)